| Paper title: |
Comparison of the efficiency and impact of physical education activities carried out online and face-to-face on students’ results in primary education |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.4316/SAM.2024.0218 |
| Published in: | Volume XVII issue 2/ 2024 |
| Publishing date: | 2024 |
| Pages: | 172-183 |
| Author(s): | Lungu Adrian
Vizitiu Lakhdari Elena |
| Abstract. | This paper aims to compare the effectiveness and impact of online and face-to-face physical education activities on primary school students. The study analyzes the motor progress of students following the two instructional methods, focusing on fundamental capacities such as speed, strength, endurance, coordination, and balance. Hypothesis of the paper: It is assumed that the method of conducting physical activities online or face-to-face significantly influences the development of motor skills and physical performance of primary school students, and face-to-face physical education lessons determine superior results. due to direct interaction, immediate correction of technique and increased motivation provided by the physical presence of the teacher and peers. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of physical education activities conducted online and face-to-face on the development of motor skills (speed, strength, endurance, coordination and balance) of primary school students, highlighting the advantages and limitations of each teaching method. Objectives of the paper: Identifying the impact of physical education activities conducted face-to-face on students’ physical performance; Determining the effectiveness of an online lesson in developing students’ motor skills; Highlighting the differences in the results obtained through physical education activities conducted online and face-to-face. Analysis of the factors that influence the effectiveness of teaching methods. |
| Keywords: | physical education, primary school, teaching methods, online learning, face-to-face learning |
| References: |
1. A. Korcz, J. Krzysztoszek, M. Łopatka, B. Popeska, H. Podnar, B. Filiz, E. Mileva, A. R., Kryeziu, Bronikowski, M. (2021). Physical Education Teachers’ Opinion about Online Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Comparative Study of European Countries. Sustainability, 13(21), 11730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111730 2. Alshammari, S. M. (2022). Efficacy of teaching physical education online: A comparative study during COVID-19 school closures. SPORT TK-Revista EuroAmericana de Ciencias del Deporte, 11, 9. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.512771 3. B. Means, Y., Toyama, R., Murphy, Baki, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307 4. B., Rîşneac, D., Milici Raţă, E. (2004). Utilizarea tehnicii de calcul în evaluarea performanţelor sportive. Editura Universităţii Transilvania. 5. C. Lonsdale, T., Sanders, Cohen, K.E. et al. (2016). Scaling-up an efficacious school-based physical activity intervention: Study protocol for the ‘Internet-based Professional Learning to help teachers support Activity in Youth’ (iPLAY) cluster randomized controlled trial and scale-up implementation evaluation. BMC Public Health 16, 873. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3243-2 6. E. Rață Milici D. (2009). Analysis Methods for Computerized Forecasting in the Athletes’ Sportive Performances for Term of the Competitional Period, The journal “Electronica ir Electrotechnika (Electronics and Electrical Engineering)”, T115 (Medicine Technology), ISSN 1392-1215, no.7(95), p.99-102. 7. I. López-Fernández, R., Burgueño, Gil-Espinosa, F. J. (2021). High School Physical Education Teachers’ Perceptions of Blended Learning One Year after the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111146 8. W. Zheng, Y. Y., Ma, Lin, H. L. (2021). Research on blended learning in physical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of Chinese students. Sage Open, 11(4), 21582440211058196, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0110275 9. Y. Hutzler, H., Beck, B., Reichman, Goral, A. (2024). Online training on inclusive physical education: differences in self-efficacy and attitudes of pre-service pe teachers across disability and activity. EUJAPA, 17(1), 7-7, doi: 10.5507/euj.2024.004 10. Z. M., Khalid, N. H., Yusniman Ismail, N. M. (2023, February). Comparing the effectiveness of online and face-to-face teaching and learning approaches on student performance using nonparametric methods. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2500, No. 1). AIP Publishing |
| Back to the journal content | |